Dispatch from the European Union | October '25
*** Our weekly Dispatches provide an overview of the most relevant recent and upcoming developments for the shift to climate neutrality in selected European countries, from policy and diplomacy to society and industry. For a bird's-eye view of the country's climate-friendly transition, read the respective 'Guide to'. ***
After a mammoth first term in which the EU passed the world’s most comprehensive package of climate laws in history, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is rowing back her signature Green Deal. The Commission has already announced a possible withdrawal of the planned Green Claims Directive and scrapped the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Regulation. The EU Deforestation Regulation has been kicked into the long grass. The Omnibus package proposed by the Commission – a promise also made to Donald Trump in the EU-US trade deal reached in January (though the EU parliament rejected the proposal in a surprise first vote result this week) – will weaken corporate sustainability reporting rules that were only just passed.
EU member state leaders at the European Council summit last night paved the way for the proposed emissions reduction target for 2040, but only after the Commission promised to dilute existing EU climate laws (more on that below). The 2035 phase-out deadline for new combustion engine cars, the focus of intense German pressure, was also discussed at the summit and could be next. On the international stage, the EU showed up empty-handed to New York Climate Week last month (see below).
The shift was signalled earlier in the year when the Commission rebranded the Green Deal as the “Clean Industrial Deal”. The Commission says this represents the next phase where climate concerns are balanced with fears over European competitiveness. But NGOs say it amounts to a bonfire of von der Leyen’s climate laws.
Stories to watch in the weeks ahead
- CBAM deadline looming – The new Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, the EU mechanism to have importers pay if their product has a higher carbon footprint than their European counterparts, is coming into effect on 1 January 2026. Industry associations in Brussels are warning that they do not have enough guidance in place for how it will work, but the Commission is trying to ease concerns by saying this is just the start of a gradual process. “CBAM starts on 1 January 2026 […] but it will only have teeth when the first declarations are expected by mid-2027,” Maria-Elena Scoppio, the director of the Commission’s tax unit, told a fertilisers industry event in Brussels last week. “In the meantime, we will be testing and refining the different elements.” She said by the end of the year the Commission plans to come out with an idea to protect EU exports from climate-unfriendly competition on the world market, an aspect not covered by CBAM.
- 2026 climate agenda – The European Commission unveiled its work programme for 2026 this week. For climate legislation, we can expect a package on strengthening energy security in the first quarter. The Circular Economy Act, a proposal to simplify electrification processes, and a revision of ETS rules for maritime and aviation and the market stability reserve will come in the third quarter. The Omnibus exercise will also bring revisions of Energy Union governance, CO2 transportation markets, the post-2030 energy efficiency framework, renewable energy rules and the climate adaptation plan in that quarter. In the fourth quarter there will be an update of the frameworks for effort sharing on greenhouse gas emissions reductions (non-ETS sectors) and for land use, land use change and forestry. Many of these reforms would be necessary to meet the planned 2040 target.
The latest in EU policymaking – last month in recap
- 2035 and 2040 targets – The EU missed the UN deadline for submitting its climate plan as part of the Paris Agreement – the Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) – last month because of a delay in getting new 2035 and 2040 emissions-reduction targets agreed at EU level. Several EU governments, including France, have warned that geopolitical and economic threats mean the 2040 target (the proposal calls for 90% reductions from 1990 levels) should be scrapped or weakened. The issue was bumped up to national leaders, who yesterday paved the way for the target – but only after the Commission promised to revise EU climate laws and introduce a revision clause. Polish prime minister Donald Tusk emerged from the summit calling it a “turning point” in the EU’s approach to climate policy. “Europe is finally speaking our language.” Climate activists had mixed reactions. “Some of the concessions and proposed flexibilities, while rather vague, have the potential to puncture the integrity of the EU’s climate efforts, if not carefully contained,” said Jens Mattias Clausen, EU director of Danish think tank CONCITO. But they welcomed the clear signal EU leaders have sent to climate ministers to adopt the target when they meet on 4 November, just days before COP30 starts.
- ETS2 in trouble – The new ETS for transport and buildings was also on the agenda yesterday, with a number of countries saying they want to delay or scrap it. At the environment ministers meeting earlier this week, EU energy commissioner Wopke Hoekstra announced four changes to try to address concerns over the emissions trading expansion: Reforming the ETS2 market stability reserve to drive greater price stability, making ETS2 revenues available earlier than expected in 2026, European Investment Bank funding for transport and buildings greening measures, and shoring up the Social Climate Fund helping low-income households pay their energy bills. This was enough to save ETS2 for now, with an additional commitment from the Commission to revise it and add a review clause.
- Weakening climate regulation – The Trump administration is demanding the EU alter its climate laws, most recently in an open letter signed along with Qatar this week warning of economic consequences if the EU doesn’t adapt its corporate sustainability reporting law. The Commission showed that it is willing to change its laws in the deal signed by the EU and US in Scotland in July by explicitly offering to make adjustments to three climate laws that the US has “concerns” about: the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), which is designed to introduce a carbon tariff for companies from countries with less stringent climate legislation to combat carbon leakage; and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD)/Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), both of which are supposed to require companies operating in Europe (including American ones) to report on their climate impact. The deal also promises to revise EU vehicle approval laws to let large pick-up trucks into Europe, according to transport NGO T&E.
- US wants shipping out of ETS – The US was last week successful in killing an International Maritime Organization deal to reduce shipping emissions. The vote has technically been delayed until next year, but analysts say the deal is almost certainly now dead. The US government is increasingly pressurising the EU to roll back its climate commitments in the sector. Green transport NGO T&E said the Trump administration was leaning on the EU to abandon its green shipping measures. “This is a shameless attempt to undermine Europe’s sovereignty,” said William Todts, Executive Director of T&E.
Dave’s picks: highlights from upcoming events and top reads
- Adjusting to new IRA reality – Business people in Brussels seem to have got the memo that Joe Biden’s supposed “most significant climate legislation in world history”, the US IRA, has been completely gutted by Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act – unlike policymakers in this town. For two years, we’ve been hearing from industry that the EU needed to give massive subsidies to its companies to stop them moving to the US to take advantage of IRA cleantech subsidies. Well, those subsidies are now gone, and EU industry has suddenly gone quiet. On 16 October, the Brussels and Washington offices of the Heinrich Böll Stiftung think tank held an event in Brussels looking at how the IRA’s demise will impact the Clean Industrial Deal plans. The panel “what remains of the IRA and the European Green Deal” made for particularly depressing listening. But one thing is clear: even with the partial row-back of the Green Deal, it cannot be compared to the complete collapse of federal climate action in the US thanks to legislation which relied entirely on subsidies and tax rebates rather than on obligations and targets.
- As climate campaigners adjust to the new reality of lower ambition across Europe, how can the public be convinced to get on board again with climate action when they have such immediate concerns about war vs peace and authoritarianism vs democracy on their minds? This was the subject of an event in Brussels hosted by Clean Energy Wire and the European Policy Centre last week. Participants at the event debated whether climate campaigners should flood the zone with warnings to counter misinformation, or whether they should focus on the economic arguments and how Europe is ceding cleantech advancements to China.
