Ukraine war puts plans for German LNG terminals back on the table

The war against Ukraine has put efforts to diversify Germany’s gas supply away from Russian deliveries at the top of the agenda. As part of these efforts, the government is going full steam ahead in supporting the build-up of the country’s own import infrastructure for liquefied natural gas (LNG). It is investing in permanent land-based import terminals, while leasing floating units in the short term. Germany has a well-developed natural gas pipeline grid and is connected to terminals in neighbouring countries, but does not currently have its own port to receive LNG directly. This factsheet looks at the current LNG situation in Germany and Europe, as well as future plans. [UPDATE adds news on plans for fifth government-chartered floating terminal]

What is LNG?

LNG, or liquefied natural gas, is natural gas that has been super-cooled (−162°C) to a liquid state for easier storage and transportation. Natural gas has 600 times less volume in liquid form than gaseous, and LNG can be transported by ship, truck or rail to places traditional natural gas pipelines cannot reach, or can even be used as a fuel directly. In general, the gas is first liquefied in its country of origin, then transported via ships and re-gasified at the destination, before being fed into existing gas grids and pipelines.

Compared to other fossil fuels, natural gas emits the least amount of carbon dioxide when burned, prompting many countries to see it as a potential “bridge fuel” between dirtier fossil fuels and carbon-free energy sources. However, natural gas is primarily composed of methane, itself a powerful greenhouse gas, and the rate of methane leakage in natural gas production, transport and storage is still hotly debated

The coronavirus pandemic caused a global demand shock in 2020, which impacted gas production. Subsequently, supply could not keep up with rebounding demand during the economic recovery, leading to a gas crisis that hit Europe hardest, with prices reaching record highs.

Russia’s war against Ukraine exacerbated the crisis from early 2022, as sanctions and other political action led to supply cuts – and expectations for a possible halt of deliveries from Russia.

Global LNG trade expanded by 6 percent in 2021, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA).

Where does it come from?

Australia and Qatar are the world’s biggest exporters of LNG. The U.S. is also ramping up LNG exports, and could become the world’s largest exporter by 2022. Looking ahead, the U.S. and Qatar are expected to engage in a two-horse race for dominance in the global LNG market, reported Bloomberg. Other major exporters include Malaysia, Nigeria, Indonesia, Algeria, Russia, Trinidad & Tobago, Oman and Papua New Guinea.

Who is buying it?

China was the world’s biggest LNG-importing country in 2021, followed by Japan. Taken together, European countries also import a sizeable share. In 2020, Europe was responsible for a quarter of global inter-regional LNG trade.

Map shows LNG terminals in the EU. Source: European Commission 2022.
LNG terminals in the EU. Source: European Commission 2022.

In 2021, 13 EU countries imported a total of 80 billion cubic metres of LNG, and LNG imports made up 20 percent of total extra-EU gas imports in 2021. The bulk of natural gas is imported via pipeline, mostly from Russia and Norway. Around 10 percent of the EU's gas needs are currently met by domestic production and the share is set to decrease over the coming years.

The biggest LNG importers in the EU were Spain (21.3 bcm), France (18.3 bcm), Italy (9.3 bcm), the Netherlands (8.7 bcm) and Belgium (6.5 bcm).

Graph shows utilisation rate of EU LNG import terminals. Source: European Commission.
Source: European Commission.

While Europe’s LNG terminals have been underutilised on an annual average, Reuters reported that most operated at full capacity in February 2022. Spain has the continent's biggest capacity – which is not yet used to full capacity – but has only limited pipeline connections to the rest of the continent.  

The European Commission says LNG can boost the EU's gas supply diversity and therefore improve energy security. In July 2018, European Commission President Jean-Claude Junker pledged that the bloc would import significant amounts of LNG from the U.S. as a concession to cool a potential trade war. While largely a matter of business rather than politics, exports from the U.S. to Europe have indeed increased every year since then. In 2021 LNG exports to the EU recorded the highest volume, reaching more than 22 billion cubic meters, with an estimated value of 12 billion euros.

In March 2022, the U.S. and the EU said that the U.S. would scale up LNG exports to Europe to 50 bcm per year starting in 2023. However, if the continent aims to replace a sizable chunk of current Russian pipeline gas with LNG from different sources, the import infrastructure is insufficient.

Due to the war in Ukraine, "we’re seeing right now a flurry of new announced projects across EU member states,” Simon Dekeyrel, a climate and energy analyst at the European Policy Centre, told Energy Monitor. “But a big LNG import terminal takes around five years to build and come online” and require "very substantial investments".

Germany’s own LNG import terminal

Germany is one of the world’s biggest gas importers and sources about 95 percent of its consumption from abroad. More than one quarter of Germany’s energy demand was covered by natural gas in 2021, the second most important energy source in the mix after oil. Russia (around 55 percent), Norway and the Netherlands were the most important source countries. Gas is currently imported to Germany only via pipelines.

Germany does not have its own regasification terminals for LNG and imports enter through neighbouring countries’ terminals, especially Belgium and the Netherlands. Germany also receives some LNG via road freight.

For years, it appeared there was no economic case for direct LNG imports to Germany, since the country is so well-connected for receiving gas through pipelines from neighbouring countries and because European LNG import capacities were heavily underutilised. Critics have also argued that LNG imports are more expensive than gas delivered via pipeline.

This had caused the debate about a domestic LNG terminal to largely subside in recent years, and plans were plagued by delays and uncertainty. However, the wish to lessen reliance on Russia in light of president Vladimir Putin's war against Ukraine, the possibility of Russia stopping deliveries, and high gas prices have revived discussions.

Germany has since gone full steam ahead on expanding its import infrastructure.

Days after Russia invaded Ukraine, chancellor Scholz announced Germany will build two domestic import terminals. Economy and climate minister Robert Habeck said this is necessary to “govern energy supply on our own state territory and guarantee sovereignty.” The German government quickly announced it will co-fund with a 50 percent stake the terminal project in Brunsbüttel. To speed up the permit and construction process, the government introduced an 'LNG Acceleration Act'. It allows the licensing authorities, under certain conditions, to temporarily waive some procedural requirements, especially in the area of environmental impact assessment.

In addition to one or more fixed onshore terminals, the German government plans to lease five so-called Floating Storage and Regasification Units (FSRU) in the short term, two of which could be installed as early as the winter 2022/2023 (plans for the fifth were announced in September 2022). By July, the government had decided that the ports of Wilhelmshaven and Brunsbüttel, Stade and Lubmin would host the terminals. A private consortium would establish a sixth terminal in Lubmin. Due to the fallout of Russia’s war against Ukraine there is international competition for FSRUs, of which there are currently just under 50 worldwide, according to German news service Tagesspiegel Background.

The chancellor emphasised that the fixed onshore terminals could eventually be converted to handle climate-friendly gases. “An LNG terminal that receives gas today can also receive green hydrogen tomorrow,” said Scholz. This is in line with plans by the economy ministry, but also subject to criticism, because it is not clear what a later conversion of the terminals would entail.

There are other reasons that could make more autonomy in the gas sector attractive for Germany. Shipping companies could need LNG as an alternative to the CO2-intensive fuel they use at the moment and LNG could play a growing role in their efforts to reduce emissions in the freight industry. If Germany’s harbours want to remain internationally competitive, they might need to supply ships with LNG in the future, German business publication Handelsblatt wrote in 2018.

The German LNG terminal projects

There had been three major German LNG terminal projects going through the planning process for several years: Scholz in his speech mentioned Brunsbüttel (German LNG Terminal) at the Elbe river near the North Sea, and a competing location in the city of Wilhelmshaven (LNG Terminal Wilhelmshaven GmbH). The third long-term project is planned in Stade (Hanseatic Energy Hub), near Hamburg. With the government getting involved, the projects have changed slightly.

Permanent onshore terminals:

In Brunsbüttel, in the northernmost state of Schleswig-Holstein, a consortium named German LNG Terminal plans to build a regasification facility with a capacity of 8-10 billion cubic metres (bcm). The project had been delayed, but the government in March 2022 said it will co-fund it with a 50 percent stake through the development bank KfW. The project is a joint venture between KfW, Dutch government-owned Gasunie (40%) and RWE (10%), and will be operated by Gasunie. Shell has said it will make a long-term booking of “a substantial part” of the terminal’s capacity. The regional government aims to change regulation to speed up the construction process. It could be operational by 2026 if plans can be sped up. "Schleswig-Holstein will do everything in its power to ensure that the chancellor's clear commitment to the construction of an LNG terminal in Brunsbüttel is taken forward swiftly," state premier Daniel Günther (CDU) has said. The project has in the past been a target of environmental protests.

Floating terminals (some with plans for later permanent onshore terminals):

Brunsbüttel will also host one of the four floating terminals leased by the government. It will have a capacity of 5 bcm/year (initially only 3.5, due to pipeline connection construction) and start operation around the turn of the year 2022/23. It is operated by Gasunie Deutschland and is set to be replaced when the permanent onshore terminal starts operations by 2026.

German energy company Uniper had planned a floating LNG terminal in Wilhelmshaven at the North Sea, but re-evaluated this in 2020 “because of market players' reluctance to make binding bookings for import capacities at the planned terminal in the current circumstances.” It officially dropped the plans several months later and said it was instead aiming to build a green hydrogen hub at the site. However, in February 2022, after Scholz’s pledge, business daily Handelsblatt reported that the government has asked Uniper to revive the LNG port plans. Wilhelmshaven will host the first German floating terminal and construction for the necessary infrastructure started in July 2022. The first gas could be imported at the end of 2022, or in early 2023. In a second project step, a permanent and expanded port solution for the FSRU is to be realised with additional unloading and handling facilities for green gases like ammonia, said Uniper.

Wilhelmshaven is set to host a second floating terminal. The unit with 5 billion cubic metres (bcm) capacity is planned to be operational from the third quarter of 2023. A consortium of E.ON, Engie and Tree Energy Solutions (TES) will operate the unit, which can supply about 5 percent of Germany’s annual consumption, according to the companies. TES plans to build up a green hydrogen import facility at the same location and once that is up and running – planned for 2025 – the floating LNG terminal will end operation.

While chancellor Scholz mentioned only Brunsbüttel and Wilhelmshaven in his parliament speech, two more locations have been announced since. Stade for some time tried to realise a terminal. Shareholders of the Hanseatic Energy Hub (HEH) are the Buss Group, the energy infrastructure operator Fluxys and Partners Group (on behalf of its customers), and U.S. chemicals company Dow. The economy ministry in July 2022 said Stade would host one of the four floating terminals. The vessel is expected to be ready for the import of LNG in the port of the future Hanseatic Energy Hub by the end of 2023. The HEH also wants to build an onshore facility, and the "open season" for the landbased capacity as of 2026 was ongoing in July 2022.

Lubmin, the site where the Nord Stream gas pipelines land in Germany, will also host two floating terminals. One would be leased by the government (operational from the end of 2023 at the earliest). It will be operated by RWE and Stena Power.

Another is planned by a private consortium (operational by end 2022): France's TotalEnergies told S&P Global it would supply the FSRU for use by privately-owned Deutsche ReGas. This non-government project in Lubmin is called "Deutsche Ostsee" and will have a capacity of 4.5 bmc/year. According to Deutsche ReGas, due to the shallow depth of the area around the port the project would see a floating storage unit situated in the Baltic Sea where LNG tankers could offload their cargoes. From there, three shuttle ships would transport the LNG to the FSRU in the port of Lubmin where it would be re-gassified and fed into the grid. 

Criticism of plans for German import terminal

There is considerable opposition to a German LNG terminal from environmental organisations. Environmental Action Germany (DUH) called Scholz’s decision “premature” and said such installations create more dependence on fossil energy.

In April, DUH criticised plans for an import terminal in Stade, arguing that it will not help with the current energy crisis and will harm the climate. “Despite all the claims to the contrary by the developer and politicians, the terminal can only be used for the import of fossil natural gas,” said managing director Sascha Müller-Kraenner. This means that it will not contribute to the energy transition, but will cement our dependence on climate-damaging fuels for decades to come.

In a report presented in July, the DUH and the Heinrich Böll Foundation said Europe should avoid “gigantic overcapacities” by coordinating the development of LNG infrastructure.

A recent report by the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) concluded that Germany does not need its own import terminals. The researchers warned the projects do not “make sense due to the long construction times and the sharp decline in natural gas demand in the medium term,” and warned of stranded assets.

All texts created by the Clean Energy Wire are available under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence (CC BY 4.0)” . They can be copied, shared and made publicly accessible by users so long as they give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.

Ask CLEW

Researching a story? Drop CLEW a line or give us a call for background material and contacts.

info@cleanenergywire.org

+49 30 62858 497

Journalism for the energy transition

Get our Newsletter
Join our Network
Find an interviewee